Integration for greater impact

Eighth Comprehensive evaluation of the GEF

Enablers of transformation

7.7 Summary

The GEF has made steady progress in integrating inclusion into its policies, programs, and delivery mechanisms. Engagement of women, IPLCs, and youth has expanded across project types and regions, supported by participation activities—particularly consultations—and systemic measures such as stakeholder analysis and GAPs. The GEF Secretariat review process has improved inclusion, especially on gender, through substantive feedback. Through initiatives like the SGP, the GEF has enabled more equitable participation by women, youth, and Indigenous Peoples—especially at the grassroots level. Community-based approaches under the SGP have improved project ownership and responsiveness by adapting to local knowledge and social realities. Work in fragile and conflict-affected contexts has further highlighted the importance of inclusive design, as marginalized groups often face heightened vulnerabilities in these settings.

While institutional measures—such as GAPs and Indigenous focal points—have supported progress, implementation gaps and limited attention to persons with disabilities remain challenges, along with ongoing gaps in monitoring, staff capacity, and follow-up support. National policy environments and entrenched social norms can also constrain inclusive implementation. Sustained engagement, improved tracking, and stronger alignment with national systems are critical for scaling inclusion across the GEF portfolio. Continued attention to these areas, accompanied by more consistent application of good practices, will be important to further strengthen inclusion across the GEF portfolio.

Sources: GEF Portal and GEF IEO Annual Performance Report (APR) 2026 data set, which includes completed projects for which terminal evaluations were independently validated through June 2025.

Note: Data exclude parent projects, projects with less than $0.5 million of GEF financing, enabling activities with less than $2 million of GEF financing, and projects from the Small Grants Programme. Closed projects refer to all projects closed as of June 30, 2025. The GEF IEO accepts validated ratings from some Agencies; however, their validation cycles may not align with the GEF IEO’s reporting cycle, which can lead to some projects with available terminal evaluations lacking validated ratings within the same reporting period; thus, validated ratings here are from the APR data set only.